The reciprocal relationship between alliance and early treatment symptoms: A two-stage individual participant data meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Even though the early alliance has been shown to robustly predict posttreatment outcomes, the question whether alliance leads to symptom reduction or symptom reduction leads to a better alliance remains unresolved. To better understand the relation between alliance and symptoms early in therapy, we meta-analyzed the lagged session-by-session within-patient effects of alliance and symptoms from Sessions 1 to 7. METHOD: We applied a 2-stage individual participant data meta-analytic approach. Based on the data sets of 17 primary studies from 9 countries that comprised 5,350 participants, we first calculated standardized session-by-session within-patient coefficients. Second, we meta-analyzed these coefficients by using random-effects models to calculate omnibus effects across the studies. RESULTS: In line with previous meta-analyses, we found that early alliance predicted posttreatment outcome. We identified significant reciprocal within-patient effects between alliance and symptoms within the first 7 sessions. Cross-level interactions indicated that higher alliances and lower symptoms positively impacted the relation between alliance and symptoms in the subsequent session. CONCLUSION: The findings provide empirical evidence that in the early phase of therapy, symptoms and alliance were reciprocally related to one other, often resulting in a positive upward spiral of higher alliance/lower symptoms that predicted higher alliances/lower symptoms in the subsequent sessions. Two-stage individual participant data meta-analyses have the potential to move the field forward by generating and interlinking well-replicable process-based knowledge. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Impact of confrontations by therapists on impairment and utilization of the therapeutic alliance.

OBJECTIVE: Striking the balance between creating challenge through confrontation (drawing attention to discrepancies) to encourage change and offering support through the therapeutic relationship to ensure safety for patients represents a central issue for psychotherapists. The aim of the present study was to assess immediate effects of confrontations by therapists on the therapeutic alliance. METHOD: We rated video recordings of 77 therapies to measure incidences of alliance ruptures/resolution attempts as well as confrontations by therapists. Change in the therapeutic alliance and therapy outcome were measured through questionnaires filled out by patients. RESULTS: Confrontations were significantly associated with ruptures/resolution attempts on the micro level. Changes in the therapeutic alliance moderated the association between confrontations and alliance ruptures on the macro level: The bigger the fraction of a session containing confrontations, the larger the fraction containing ruptures, given a prior positive change in the therapeutic alliance. Therapists' use of confrontation during a resolution attempt was associated with significantly better therapy outcomes than no use of confrontation during or no resolution attempt. CONCLUSIONS: Confrontations by therapists may temporarily impair the therapeutic alliance, but might also lead to better therapy outcomes when used to make an alliance rupture explicit as part of a resolution attempt. Clinical or methodological significance: This study provides quantitative explorations of therapists' fears and hopes regarding the use of confrontations (defined as focus on a discrepancy by the therapist). Results point to associations between confrontations and alliance ruptures, especially in the context of a secure alliance. Furthermore, resolution attempts might profit from initial confrontations regarding the relevant alliance rupture.

Comment: Can some interpersonalists be more different than alike? Implications for method in practice and research.

The paper provides a commentary on two qualitative case studies of therapist use of immediacy in two brief interpersonal psychotherapies involving two senior White male clinicians and two young female patients with diverse identities (Hill et al., 2008; see record 2008-13167-001; Kaspar, Hill, & Kivlighan, 2008; see record 2008-13167-002). The commentary proposes an alternative interpersonal model by which the data collected could be examined. The model suggests that therapist and patient interact in a complex process of power and affection toward mutual recognition, which is further shaped by their respective gender and cultural identities. Several implications for the study of the psychotherapeutic situation based on this interpersonal model are presented, including using observer-based measures that can assess power plays and therapist immediate awareness, as well as another qualitative strategy that would capture the richness of clinical process. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).